Name confusion

Anyone who's in sales will tell you that it's important to have memorable names for your product. Companies can get involved in complicated deals just to procure the rights to the ideal name.

I note this because I had a couple of experiences of name confusion the last couple of days.


Sony's Alphabet Soup Problem

Sometimes Sony comes up with easy to remember names for their products. Sometimes not. The NEX-FS100 is a bit of a mouthful, yet shortened down to the FS100 it's easy to say and somewhat memorable. But try to remember the name of their Action Camera? It's the HDR-AS15. And even if you can remember it, there's little point in telling someone the name, because they won't remember it.

I was giving a short talk on the camera and I completely spaced on the name. Not that I've actually had cause to use the name other than when I ordered it.

And then there's the NEX-EA50UH. Now there's a name that rolls off the tongue.

Sony needs to take some tips from Canon. They're C100, C300, and C500 are easy to remember. Of course, they do have the XA20, XF100, etc, but I still think even those are easier to remember than NEX-EA50 (let's just agree to do Sony a solid and drop the UH).


Blackmagic

And then there's Blackmagic. They only have three cameras, but they managed to name two of them almost the same thing:


And it' not like the cameras are that similar.

Throw in the fact that the word Design sometimes gets added (Blackmagic Design Cinema Camera), and you have a long string of words that the eye - and the mouth - can be tempted to jump over and just assume what's there. This resulted in some confusion today when I was reading Red Shark News "The Original Blackmagic Cinema camera - RedShark's long-awaited full review!"

The first line of the article reads: "We were first with the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera" and I'd already read their previous "first hands on" piece about the Pocket Cinema Camera, so ... well you can probably guess where this is going.

Reading the piece - okay, 'Read' is a strong word, I was skimming through it for the highlights - I started getting a bit confused, because a) I hadn't read the headline closely, and b) I didn't read the rest of the first line, which read: "but until now we haven't reviewed the original Blackmagic Cinema Camera."

So yeah, stupid me. It was a review of the original Cinema Camera, and not the Pocket Cinema Camera.

In my defense, often my eyes are going faster than my brain is absorbing...

And I will add that this piece is an interesting take on the Original Blackmagic Cinema Camera; if you haven't already read up about them.


All I can say is, I'm glad they didn't name the forthcoming camera the Blackmagic UltraHD Cinema Camera.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony GV-D200 review

Image
Sony GV-D200 I've been using a Sony GV-D200 deck to transfer old Video8 and Hi8 tapes. Some of these tapes are over twenty years old, and no longer having a Hi8 camcorder that worked I was concerned that if I didn't do something about transferring them to a more modern format soon, I might never be able to. While Sony no longer make camcorders that use these tapes - that I know of - Sony does still sell the GV-D200 deck (or Video Walkman, as it's sometimes labelled.) They also offer the GV-D800, which is almost identical but adds a small LCD screen for about $120 more. I didn't think I'd need a screen since I was using this to capture to the computer, but you will need an external monitor when you first set it up. Physically, the device is small. At 5 7/8" wide, 5 3/8" deep and 2" high, it's the smallest video deck I've encountered. I used to have a Video8 deck that I thought was small; and it was twice as deep and twice as high. The t...
Read more

Response: Which iPhone to Get?

Image
In response to my iPhone musings, I got the following reader email which actually sums up a lot of my second and third thoughts too: You might have a point about the fancier camera, but otherwise I would buy the smaller model. Its screen is about the same size as that of my Nexus 4, and I don't feel at all like it limits me with a too-small screen. But I do sometimes stretch to get my thumb the reach to the other corner of the screen. It is plenty big for a phone. A phone is a pocket thing. (Well, in my case it lives an ancient REI soft sunglasses case that I have on my belt.) Ubiquitous, handy, convenient, almost always with me. Small is crucial for all of that. Certainly a large screen is cool, but you need a place to put it: don't break a fundamental feature of a pocket phone by getting too big. That is what your small tablet is for. I have my phone with me almost always. I have my Nexus 7 tablet with me nearly as much. The bigger screen is great, yet it fits in some...
Read more

Should you buy the Sony NEX-FS100 Kit Lens?

Image
The Sony NEX-FS100 is available in two configurations: B & H : NEX-FS100U Camcorder only $4,999 B & H : NEX-FS100U (with 18-200mm lens) $5,599 But what does that extra $600 get you? It get's you this: Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Zoom Lens for NEX Camera This lens is also available separately for $799.99, so at $200 off you'd think everyone would be jumping on it. But not so fast... In his article about switching from the Canon 5D Mark II to the Sony NEX-FS100 , Paul Antico  at Need Creative says of the kit lens: 7) Its 18-200 F3.6-6.3 kit lens absolutely sucks and should be avoided (thankfully, you can order it without one) [ 1 ] But is it that bad? At B & H 's site, 43 reviews give it an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. That's not a bad rating, though many of these people are using it for stills, and the most common complaint noted is how large and heavy it is. Of course this feeling of size would be exacerbated when you put it on a tiny camera ...
Read more