Adding Captions in YouTube

I wanted to caption the car review video, but I hadn't used YouTube's captioning before. First I tried the machine captioning they offer (the feature is in beta.) I think the system had trouble with my voice, because the results aren't very good. Here's some of the highlights:
there's evidence in the middle
it's it's cold and it's plastic your pals
rhonda rowland the vehicle without the Christian
as the car sports history
[…]

the new recruits some fashion
providing extra taxes to the
well the driver's seat
[…]

the sitting position in the back of their
minds even more all right
[…]

no love lost for the ride in this model has
a wheel drive
[…]
I love machine translation errors; they can be so poetic sometimes. I particularly like the line:
the sitting position in the back of their
minds even more all right
But "no love lost for the ride in this model" when it should be: "
"Now while it looks pretty rugged and this model...?!" That's a serious misconception!

Since it's only two minutes long, I decided to transcribe it myself. The YouTube Help center explains that the format should look "something like" this:
0:00:03.490,0:00:07.430
>> FISHER: All right. So, let's begin.
This session is: Going Social

0:00:07.430,0:00:11.600
with the YouTube APIs. I am
Jeff Fisher,
0:00:11.600,0:00:14.009
and this is Johann Hartmann,
we're presenting today.
0:00:14.009,0:00:15.889
[pause]

The Format seems to be:
[start time],[end time]
caption text

where the time is formatted: [h]:[mm]:[ss].[millisecond]
I'm guessing the last part is milliseconds, as it's three digits and not two (two digits would make sense if it were frames)

I copied that format religiously (I thought) and timed everything mostly to the nearest second or half second. It looked like this:
0:00:03.000,0:00:05.000
It’s square
0:00:06.000,0:00:08.000
It opens in the middle
0:00:08.100,0:00:11.500
It’s seats fold and it’s plastic floor repels water
I saved it as a .txt file, and uploaded it through the Captioning and Subtitles interface in YouTube.

Uploading a caption file to YouTube

But when I loaded it in, it didn't work properly; it pretty much displayed the whole file in the first few seconds! Turns out you need to add a return between the end of each line and the next time code, so it should look like this:
0:00:03.000,0:00:05.000
It’s square

0:00:06.000,0:00:08.000
It opens in the middle

0:00:08.100,0:00:11.509
It’s seats fold and it’s plastic floor repels water
Once I did that, it worked perfectly.

Captioned video

I did do some contractions of what was actually said. In reality, I probably didn't need too; it will display a fairly large amount of text  (as witnessed by the very last line.) But when you're captioning for readers, it sometimes pays to cut down on the text - where possible - to make it easier for the reader/viewer to keep up with both the text and visual action.





LINKS
Google Help: Getting Started: Adding/Editing captions
NotesOnVideo: I do a car review

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony GV-D200 review

Image
Sony GV-D200 I've been using a Sony GV-D200 deck to transfer old Video8 and Hi8 tapes. Some of these tapes are over twenty years old, and no longer having a Hi8 camcorder that worked I was concerned that if I didn't do something about transferring them to a more modern format soon, I might never be able to. While Sony no longer make camcorders that use these tapes - that I know of - Sony does still sell the GV-D200 deck (or Video Walkman, as it's sometimes labelled.) They also offer the GV-D800, which is almost identical but adds a small LCD screen for about $120 more. I didn't think I'd need a screen since I was using this to capture to the computer, but you will need an external monitor when you first set it up. Physically, the device is small. At 5 7/8" wide, 5 3/8" deep and 2" high, it's the smallest video deck I've encountered. I used to have a Video8 deck that I thought was small; and it was twice as deep and twice as high. The t...
Read more

Response: Which iPhone to Get?

Image
In response to my iPhone musings, I got the following reader email which actually sums up a lot of my second and third thoughts too: You might have a point about the fancier camera, but otherwise I would buy the smaller model. Its screen is about the same size as that of my Nexus 4, and I don't feel at all like it limits me with a too-small screen. But I do sometimes stretch to get my thumb the reach to the other corner of the screen. It is plenty big for a phone. A phone is a pocket thing. (Well, in my case it lives an ancient REI soft sunglasses case that I have on my belt.) Ubiquitous, handy, convenient, almost always with me. Small is crucial for all of that. Certainly a large screen is cool, but you need a place to put it: don't break a fundamental feature of a pocket phone by getting too big. That is what your small tablet is for. I have my phone with me almost always. I have my Nexus 7 tablet with me nearly as much. The bigger screen is great, yet it fits in some...
Read more

Should you buy the Sony NEX-FS100 Kit Lens?

Image
The Sony NEX-FS100 is available in two configurations: B & H : NEX-FS100U Camcorder only $4,999 B & H : NEX-FS100U (with 18-200mm lens) $5,599 But what does that extra $600 get you? It get's you this: Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Zoom Lens for NEX Camera This lens is also available separately for $799.99, so at $200 off you'd think everyone would be jumping on it. But not so fast... In his article about switching from the Canon 5D Mark II to the Sony NEX-FS100 , Paul Antico  at Need Creative says of the kit lens: 7) Its 18-200 F3.6-6.3 kit lens absolutely sucks and should be avoided (thankfully, you can order it without one) [ 1 ] But is it that bad? At B & H 's site, 43 reviews give it an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. That's not a bad rating, though many of these people are using it for stills, and the most common complaint noted is how large and heavy it is. Of course this feeling of size would be exacerbated when you put it on a tiny camera ...
Read more