Maybe Vincent Laforet was right

Back in April Vincent Laforet started tweeting and posted about a new device he'd used that would be a "game changer" and would shake things up in the industry as much as the Canon 5D Mark II had. He said that this was the first thing since the 5D Mark II that he felt was as important, and added "I have a hard time imagining the day where I won’t be using it on a shoot."

The device was, of course, the MōVI, a "revolutionary" camera stabilizer.

The footage was certainly impressive, but at $15,000 for the M10 (they have a M5 that will sell for $7,500) I found it difficult to see this as a game changer for the majority of the video production industry. I just couldn't see a lot of indie or corporate video people spending that much money for a video stabilizer. And while the shots were pretty impressive, a regular Steadicam shot - done carefully - is pretty similar, and probably just as effective.

But, now there seems to be a dozen or so companies and individuals coming out with similar products, and the price of some of these is much, much lower. Relentless Inc is offering the Defy G2 Gimball at $2,300. It only supports a camera up to 2 lbs, but a lot of people are shooting with cameras that weigh less than that. And it seems likely there will also be under $1,000 products, though they may only support a GoPro Hero.

  • There's now a "Brushless Gimbal" group on Vimeo.
  • The company Brushless Gimbals sells "all the components required to build your own brushless direct drive gimbal for your camera."
  • A Google search will turn up lots of examples and videos

So is this a revolution? Will we all be sick of pointless "flying" shots in a couple of months? Will everyone have one in two years?

I'm not sure, but I'm starting to think that Vincent Laforet was a little more right than I originally thought he was. He just might have gotten the specific product wrong; it's not so much the MōVI that's creating the revolution, as the revolution in brushless gimbals. As Tom Parker wrote in his blog about creating his own test project:
Over the last few months brushless motor gimbals have taken to the spotlight, and for obvious reasons. They are simple to start with, it only takes some bent metal in L shapes with some motors bolted on and there you go. As long as its balanced it will work a treat.



eSteady Camera Rig For GoPro from Motor Reflex on Vimeo.

Comments

Unknown said…
The most interesting part.... none appear to be on the market yet!
Jul 29, 2013, 6:45:00 AM
Michael Murie said…
Yes, but I think that will change very shortly; the Defy is supposed to ship early August. They may be a bit late, but I think they will ship shortly.

There's demo units and people building their own units, so I think it's within reach
Jul 29, 2013, 7:17:00 AM
Anonymous said…
Hi
Thanks for sharing this very useful
kindly visit us :https://sblcorp.com/lidar-data-processing-outsourcing-services/
Mar 7, 2023, 1:31:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony GV-D200 review

Image
Sony GV-D200 I've been using a Sony GV-D200 deck to transfer old Video8 and Hi8 tapes. Some of these tapes are over twenty years old, and no longer having a Hi8 camcorder that worked I was concerned that if I didn't do something about transferring them to a more modern format soon, I might never be able to. While Sony no longer make camcorders that use these tapes - that I know of - Sony does still sell the GV-D200 deck (or Video Walkman, as it's sometimes labelled.) They also offer the GV-D800, which is almost identical but adds a small LCD screen for about $120 more. I didn't think I'd need a screen since I was using this to capture to the computer, but you will need an external monitor when you first set it up. Physically, the device is small. At 5 7/8" wide, 5 3/8" deep and 2" high, it's the smallest video deck I've encountered. I used to have a Video8 deck that I thought was small; and it was twice as deep and twice as high. The t
Read more

Response: Which iPhone to Get?

Image
In response to my iPhone musings, I got the following reader email which actually sums up a lot of my second and third thoughts too: You might have a point about the fancier camera, but otherwise I would buy the smaller model. Its screen is about the same size as that of my Nexus 4, and I don't feel at all like it limits me with a too-small screen. But I do sometimes stretch to get my thumb the reach to the other corner of the screen. It is plenty big for a phone. A phone is a pocket thing. (Well, in my case it lives an ancient REI soft sunglasses case that I have on my belt.) Ubiquitous, handy, convenient, almost always with me. Small is crucial for all of that. Certainly a large screen is cool, but you need a place to put it: don't break a fundamental feature of a pocket phone by getting too big. That is what your small tablet is for. I have my phone with me almost always. I have my Nexus 7 tablet with me nearly as much. The bigger screen is great, yet it fits in some
Read more

Should you buy the Sony NEX-FS100 Kit Lens?

Image
The Sony NEX-FS100 is available in two configurations: B & H : NEX-FS100U Camcorder only $4,999 B & H : NEX-FS100U (with 18-200mm lens) $5,599 But what does that extra $600 get you? It get's you this: Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Zoom Lens for NEX Camera This lens is also available separately for $799.99, so at $200 off you'd think everyone would be jumping on it. But not so fast... In his article about switching from the Canon 5D Mark II to the Sony NEX-FS100 , Paul Antico  at Need Creative says of the kit lens: 7) Its 18-200 F3.6-6.3 kit lens absolutely sucks and should be avoided (thankfully, you can order it without one) [ 1 ] But is it that bad? At B & H 's site, 43 reviews give it an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. That's not a bad rating, though many of these people are using it for stills, and the most common complaint noted is how large and heavy it is. Of course this feeling of size would be exacerbated when you put it on a tiny camera
Read more