The Ninja looks cool....but...

The Atomos Ninja looked interesting when it appeared back in September, and I'm still intrigued by it. MacVideo.TV has posted an interview with Jeremy Young, CEO of Atomos, where he goes into quite some detail about it's features and how it functions. You'll find out a lot about this $1,000 digital recorder that uses the Apple ProRes codec and saves to 2.5" Notebook HDD or SSD drives. The Ninja uses dual batteries for power, records two analog audio channels in addition to HDMI audio, has LANC passthrough (and control) and boasts a simply touch-based interface.It will be available in December for $995.

With any new company coming out with a product like this, there's always the question whether they are going to be able to deliver on time, for the price - and with the quality - they are promising. We really have to wait until it's out and has been reviewed before buying.

The problem for me is that as cool as this seems, I don't really have any cameras that can be used with it. The Canon 7D [B & H $1,599 - $100 rebate] does output HD video via HDMI, but it's not the full 1920x1080 (it's 1620 x 910), and it has a record icon on it. I've read of people taking that video and scaling it up and removing the icon, but that seems like a lot of work! The Ninja just makes me wish that Canon would send out the full frame out the HDMI port. Maybe the Canon 5D Mark III?

But the Sony HXR-NX5u [B & H $3,999] spits out uncompressed video out it's HDMI port, so the Ninja would be a great playmate for that; or maybe the Sony NEX-VG10 [B & H $1,999.99].


Macvideo.tv: Enter the Ninja: affordable 4:2:2 10 bit ProRes recorder (parts 1 and 2)
Atomos.com

NotesOnVideo: Some Interesting New Products
NotesOnVideo: Canon 7D - what resolution is the video really?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony GV-D200 review

Image
Sony GV-D200 I've been using a Sony GV-D200 deck to transfer old Video8 and Hi8 tapes. Some of these tapes are over twenty years old, and no longer having a Hi8 camcorder that worked I was concerned that if I didn't do something about transferring them to a more modern format soon, I might never be able to. While Sony no longer make camcorders that use these tapes - that I know of - Sony does still sell the GV-D200 deck (or Video Walkman, as it's sometimes labelled.) They also offer the GV-D800, which is almost identical but adds a small LCD screen for about $120 more. I didn't think I'd need a screen since I was using this to capture to the computer, but you will need an external monitor when you first set it up. Physically, the device is small. At 5 7/8" wide, 5 3/8" deep and 2" high, it's the smallest video deck I've encountered. I used to have a Video8 deck that I thought was small; and it was twice as deep and twice as high. The t
Read more

Response: Which iPhone to Get?

Image
In response to my iPhone musings, I got the following reader email which actually sums up a lot of my second and third thoughts too: You might have a point about the fancier camera, but otherwise I would buy the smaller model. Its screen is about the same size as that of my Nexus 4, and I don't feel at all like it limits me with a too-small screen. But I do sometimes stretch to get my thumb the reach to the other corner of the screen. It is plenty big for a phone. A phone is a pocket thing. (Well, in my case it lives an ancient REI soft sunglasses case that I have on my belt.) Ubiquitous, handy, convenient, almost always with me. Small is crucial for all of that. Certainly a large screen is cool, but you need a place to put it: don't break a fundamental feature of a pocket phone by getting too big. That is what your small tablet is for. I have my phone with me almost always. I have my Nexus 7 tablet with me nearly as much. The bigger screen is great, yet it fits in some
Read more

Should you buy the Sony NEX-FS100 Kit Lens?

Image
The Sony NEX-FS100 is available in two configurations: B & H : NEX-FS100U Camcorder only $4,999 B & H : NEX-FS100U (with 18-200mm lens) $5,599 But what does that extra $600 get you? It get's you this: Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Zoom Lens for NEX Camera This lens is also available separately for $799.99, so at $200 off you'd think everyone would be jumping on it. But not so fast... In his article about switching from the Canon 5D Mark II to the Sony NEX-FS100 , Paul Antico  at Need Creative says of the kit lens: 7) Its 18-200 F3.6-6.3 kit lens absolutely sucks and should be avoided (thankfully, you can order it without one) [ 1 ] But is it that bad? At B & H 's site, 43 reviews give it an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. That's not a bad rating, though many of these people are using it for stills, and the most common complaint noted is how large and heavy it is. Of course this feeling of size would be exacerbated when you put it on a tiny camera
Read more