One Card to Rule Them All

There must be something in the air - or maybe it was that freakingly magical Photoshop Context-Aware fill demo - but I'm really getting amped up for the announcement of Adobe CS 5 (and this is someone who only uses Photoshop and Illustrator from CS2 right now!)

I haven't been using Premiere Pro since version 1, but now with all this Mercury Playback Engine chatter, I'm getting intrigued. Not only will it accelerate effects and playback, but H.264 compression as well. Now that would be something to get excited about.

Unfortunately, it seems you need a particular kind of graphics card to get it to work. The word at last night's Boston Final Cut Pro User's Group meeting was that Mac users should be looking at the nVIDIA FX4800. A nice piece of hardware that sells for $1,400, though if I want to get that, I'm going to have to replace my decidedly aged Mac Pro. This upgrade could cost me an arm and two legs!

Adobe says that support for other cards will be added, and according to a quote in Millimeter, the it maywork with MacBook Pro's in the future (now THAT would be nice!)
Baker singled out the Apple MacBook Pro as a beneficiary of the Mercury engine. Many Apple notebooks find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to play back even one stream of raw AVCHD MTS files in Premiere Pro and other programs, as this reporter knows well. (I have a 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo with the included GeForce 8600M GT, and MTS playback simply does not happen.) Of course, no mobile GPUs are on the current list of supported GPUs, either Mac or PC, so laptop users will have to wait for future developments to employ Mercury playback.

LINKS

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony GV-D200 review

Image
Sony GV-D200 I've been using a Sony GV-D200 deck to transfer old Video8 and Hi8 tapes. Some of these tapes are over twenty years old, and no longer having a Hi8 camcorder that worked I was concerned that if I didn't do something about transferring them to a more modern format soon, I might never be able to. While Sony no longer make camcorders that use these tapes - that I know of - Sony does still sell the GV-D200 deck (or Video Walkman, as it's sometimes labelled.) They also offer the GV-D800, which is almost identical but adds a small LCD screen for about $120 more. I didn't think I'd need a screen since I was using this to capture to the computer, but you will need an external monitor when you first set it up. Physically, the device is small. At 5 7/8" wide, 5 3/8" deep and 2" high, it's the smallest video deck I've encountered. I used to have a Video8 deck that I thought was small; and it was twice as deep and twice as high. The t
Read more

Response: Which iPhone to Get?

Image
In response to my iPhone musings, I got the following reader email which actually sums up a lot of my second and third thoughts too: You might have a point about the fancier camera, but otherwise I would buy the smaller model. Its screen is about the same size as that of my Nexus 4, and I don't feel at all like it limits me with a too-small screen. But I do sometimes stretch to get my thumb the reach to the other corner of the screen. It is plenty big for a phone. A phone is a pocket thing. (Well, in my case it lives an ancient REI soft sunglasses case that I have on my belt.) Ubiquitous, handy, convenient, almost always with me. Small is crucial for all of that. Certainly a large screen is cool, but you need a place to put it: don't break a fundamental feature of a pocket phone by getting too big. That is what your small tablet is for. I have my phone with me almost always. I have my Nexus 7 tablet with me nearly as much. The bigger screen is great, yet it fits in some
Read more

Should you buy the Sony NEX-FS100 Kit Lens?

Image
The Sony NEX-FS100 is available in two configurations: B & H : NEX-FS100U Camcorder only $4,999 B & H : NEX-FS100U (with 18-200mm lens) $5,599 But what does that extra $600 get you? It get's you this: Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Zoom Lens for NEX Camera This lens is also available separately for $799.99, so at $200 off you'd think everyone would be jumping on it. But not so fast... In his article about switching from the Canon 5D Mark II to the Sony NEX-FS100 , Paul Antico  at Need Creative says of the kit lens: 7) Its 18-200 F3.6-6.3 kit lens absolutely sucks and should be avoided (thankfully, you can order it without one) [ 1 ] But is it that bad? At B & H 's site, 43 reviews give it an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. That's not a bad rating, though many of these people are using it for stills, and the most common complaint noted is how large and heavy it is. Of course this feeling of size would be exacerbated when you put it on a tiny camera
Read more