Camcorderinfo reviews Nikon D300

Camcorderinfo reviews the Nikon D300, and while they did like it's low-light capabilities (it just beat out the Canon 7D in low-light performance) they were generally unhappy that Nikon didn't add any new video capabilities:
The Nikon D300s is not the camera to get if you're serious about using a DSLR to record video. It doesn't have a good set of video controls and its overall video performance is far behind similarly-priced models from Canon and Panasonic. The fact that the D300s can't even record a Full HD image (its resolution tops out at 1280 x 720) is probably its biggest downside from a video perspective.
Remember that Camcorderinfo is reviewing the camera for video; stills photographers can still love the D300s!


Over the past month or so I've come across a number of photographers complaining about Nikon's lack of involvement in the HD side of the SLR market. Philip Bloom made a comment about it in his interview on Cinema 5D, and in the Lensflare 002 podcast, Philip Bloom (again), media producer Scott Bourne and Steve Weiss from Zacuto go off on Nikon as well.

They really expected Nikon to at least match the features Canon has added. A number of Nikon owners are now wondering if they need to jump ship...


It's kind of ironic that Nikon seems oblivious to this market; back in the day of the great conspiracy theories (when people were sure that Canon was hamstringing the video capabilities of the 5D Mark II because they disn't want to disrupt their video camera business) a lot of people thought that the market was ripe for Nikon's taking. Without a rival video business, Nikon would be able to turn their SLRs into capable video cameras without any limitation.

Instead, we've seen Canon continue to evolve and enhance their products - even promising a firmware update for the 5D Mark II - while Nikon seems to drift along without concern about this marketplace.

Of course, those of us who are excited about HD DSLRs imagine we're a big part of the market; since we're all talking to each other, we might imagine that we're more significant than we really are. Nikon may have decided that the small additional sales are insignificant compared to the added work they'd have to do to really challenge Canon in this market segment.

Camcorderinfo: Nikon D300s DSLR Camera Review

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sony GV-D200 review

Image
Sony GV-D200 I've been using a Sony GV-D200 deck to transfer old Video8 and Hi8 tapes. Some of these tapes are over twenty years old, and no longer having a Hi8 camcorder that worked I was concerned that if I didn't do something about transferring them to a more modern format soon, I might never be able to. While Sony no longer make camcorders that use these tapes - that I know of - Sony does still sell the GV-D200 deck (or Video Walkman, as it's sometimes labelled.) They also offer the GV-D800, which is almost identical but adds a small LCD screen for about $120 more. I didn't think I'd need a screen since I was using this to capture to the computer, but you will need an external monitor when you first set it up. Physically, the device is small. At 5 7/8" wide, 5 3/8" deep and 2" high, it's the smallest video deck I've encountered. I used to have a Video8 deck that I thought was small; and it was twice as deep and twice as high. The t...
Read more

Response: Which iPhone to Get?

Image
In response to my iPhone musings, I got the following reader email which actually sums up a lot of my second and third thoughts too: You might have a point about the fancier camera, but otherwise I would buy the smaller model. Its screen is about the same size as that of my Nexus 4, and I don't feel at all like it limits me with a too-small screen. But I do sometimes stretch to get my thumb the reach to the other corner of the screen. It is plenty big for a phone. A phone is a pocket thing. (Well, in my case it lives an ancient REI soft sunglasses case that I have on my belt.) Ubiquitous, handy, convenient, almost always with me. Small is crucial for all of that. Certainly a large screen is cool, but you need a place to put it: don't break a fundamental feature of a pocket phone by getting too big. That is what your small tablet is for. I have my phone with me almost always. I have my Nexus 7 tablet with me nearly as much. The bigger screen is great, yet it fits in some...
Read more

Should you buy the Sony NEX-FS100 Kit Lens?

Image
The Sony NEX-FS100 is available in two configurations: B & H : NEX-FS100U Camcorder only $4,999 B & H : NEX-FS100U (with 18-200mm lens) $5,599 But what does that extra $600 get you? It get's you this: Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Zoom Lens for NEX Camera This lens is also available separately for $799.99, so at $200 off you'd think everyone would be jumping on it. But not so fast... In his article about switching from the Canon 5D Mark II to the Sony NEX-FS100 , Paul Antico  at Need Creative says of the kit lens: 7) Its 18-200 F3.6-6.3 kit lens absolutely sucks and should be avoided (thankfully, you can order it without one) [ 1 ] But is it that bad? At B & H 's site, 43 reviews give it an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. That's not a bad rating, though many of these people are using it for stills, and the most common complaint noted is how large and heavy it is. Of course this feeling of size would be exacerbated when you put it on a tiny camera ...
Read more